THEN WHAT?
Menu
HealthAustralia · 2020

Ruby Princess: what happened after the liability judgment?

The civil liability findings survived appeal. A later court-approved process required group members to establish their individual losses.

THE ORIGINAL STORY20 March 2020
Cassandra Bain
20 March 2020
Ruby Princess cruise ship: Three test positive to coronavirus in Sydney
Archive photograph of the Ruby Princess at Circular Quay accompanying SBS’s original outbreak reportNSW Port Authority · archive photograph in SBS’s original report
Read the original report

The first outbreak alerts followed disembarkation.

On 20 March 2020, SBS reported the first positive tests after the ship docked in Sydney. The Evening Standard’s same-day report described the race to contact passengers. The case numbers were early reports at different points in a developing outbreak, not final totals. The SBS photograph shows the Ruby Princess at Circular Quay; it is an archive image accompanying that original report, not a photograph of the March 2020 disembarkation.

THEN WHAT?

Liability stood. Passenger claims still needed individual assessment.

Symbolic halftone illustration of a passenger ship in Sydney Harbour

The cruise companies’ liability challenge failed in July 2025. The next claims process required individual evidence and court approval; registration has since closed. A completed payment to every passenger has not been verified.

Appeal judgment · Full Federal Court · 29 July 2025

The story, in dates

Event dates
Scroll back through the story

The liability findings stood

The Full Federal Court dismissed both the cruise companies’ challenge to liability and lead applicant Susan Karpik’s challenge to the assessment of her damages. Its judgment upheld the negligence and consumer-law findings about the failure to cancel the cruise and warn passengers of the heightened risk. This was a civil judgment, not a criminal conviction.

Appeal judgment · Full Federal Court · 29 July 2025

A finding of liability was not a payment to everyone

The court credited Karpik’s fare refund against her damages for distress and disappointment. Her individual injury assessment did not meet the statutory threshold for non-economic loss damages. Those conclusions concerned her case; they did not decide the amount, if any, owed to each other passenger.

Appeal judgment · Full Federal Court · 29 July 2025

Other claims moved to individual assessment

The court-approved notice set out a process for registered group members’ claims to be examined by independent referees. Claimants would need evidence of their own loss, and the companies could defend the claims. Referees’ reports required court approval before damages could be paid. The notice established a procedure; it did not announce a completed payout.

Court-approved claims notice · December 2025

The registration window closed

The notice set 13 March 2026 as the registration deadline. Shine Lawyers’ current case page says registration is closed. Its account says the court-approved notice was sent in December 2025. This deadline was a step in the claims process, rather than a finding that every claim had been assessed or paid.

Court-approved claims notice · December 2025 · Registration status · Shine Lawyers · checked 10 October 2026

Sources for this update

  1. 01Appeal judgment · Full Federal Court · 29 July 2025
  2. 02Court-approved claims notice · December 2025
  3. 03Registration status · Shine Lawyers · checked 10 October 2026

The story continues when the evidence does.

Status checked on 10 October 2026. Registration is closed, but the inspected sources do not provide a complete account of final assessments or payments to all group members. The July 2025 judgment and later claims procedure establish meaningful legal steps; they do not establish universal compensation. This is a report on the case, not individual claims advice.

Still wondering about another story?

Tell us what you remember. We'll follow up...

Ask Then What? →
No exact headline needed.
Request a follow-up →
We’ll use your email only to handle this request and let you know if it’s published. No newsletter signup.Add a name to be credited publicly if your question becomes a story. Leave it blank for a “Requested update” stamp.Your email stays private. Requests are reviewed; publication is not guaranteed. We use your details only for this request, as explained in our privacy notice.
Next: your email. No newsletter signup.