THEN WHAT?
Menu
Environment & CommunityAustralia · 2021

Mouse numbers fell. For some people, the stress remained.

The 2021 NSW mouse plague filled homes and ruined crops. Research published in 2026 examined what remained for affected residents two years later.

THE ORIGINAL STORY22 January 2021
Giselle Wakatama and Keely Johnson
22 January 2021
Mouse plague wreaks havoc across parts of NSW, farmers fear for crops
Mice huddled together in the ABC’s original January outbreak report; supplied by CSIROSupplied: CSIRO
Read the original report

A plague reaches farms and homes.

The outbreak developed over months. This January report described mice across parts of NSW and Queensland, damage to crops and household appliances, and shortages of traps and bait. By February, regional newspapers were reporting the same invasion of everyday life. These are original outbreak reports, rather than later recovery or research stories.

THEN WHAT?

A later study found lasting stress in some people who lived through the plague.

Editorial mouse illustration, not documentary evidence

The 2021 NSW infestation subsided, but a later survey showed why falling mouse numbers were not the whole recovery story. Among 1,691 affected adults surveyed about two years later, average ongoing stress was low, while 23% had scores above a threshold for possible PTSD-related concern. These were questionnaire results, not clinical diagnoses or an estimate for everyone in NSW. The outbreak ended with a lasting burden for some participants. A separate April paper calculated about A$100.62 million in direct costs within its surveyed sample, adding an economic measure of the aftermath.

The story, in dates

Event dates
Scroll back through the story

The infestation subsided

By December, ABC reporting described the NSW plague as appearing to be over. Experts pointed to persistent rain, flooding and baiting, while warning against complacency. That described the mouse numbers at the time; it did not establish that everyone’s losses or distress had ended.

ABC News · outbreak subsides · 16 December 2021

The later study measured a human aftermath

CSIRO researchers and colleagues surveyed affected adults in regional NSW in October–December 2023. Their paper was published in Scientific Reports in February 2026. The group included farmers and people whose livelihoods were outside farming. Average ongoing stress was low, but that average concealed a minority with substantially higher scores.

Mankad and colleagues · Scientific Reports · 11 February 2026 · CSIRO · researcher publication record

A screening score is not a diagnosis

The survey combined an online panel with recruitment through industry channels and social media. People had to report being affected by the plague. Responses relied partly on memories of 2021, and the study was observational. It cannot establish that the plague caused every symptom, diagnose individual participants, or tell us the proportion of all residents with PTSD.

Mankad and colleagues · Scientific Reports · 11 February 2026

Recovery needs more than a falling mouse count

The useful distinction is between the infestation ending and people recovering. This research adds evidence about the second question. It supports looking beyond crops and bait when assessing the aftermath, while keeping uncertainty about individual health and population-wide effects visible.

Mankad and colleagues · Scientific Reports · 11 February 2026

The bills outlasted the mice too

A second paper put numbers to another part of the aftermath. Okello and colleagues calculated about A$100.62 million in direct costs among their sample of 1,691 regional NSW residents. The total included spending, damage, lost production and income, and the value of time spent cleaning and resowing. It was not a statewide bill or a compensation payout.

Farmers bore roughly two-thirds of that calculated cost. The authors also identified limits: the survey came about two years after the plague, recollections could be imperfect, and wider economic effects were outside the calculation. Together with the stress study, it shows why the disappearance of the mice could not erase what the outbreak had cost.

Okello and colleagues · Economic aftermath · PLOS One · 21 April 2026

Sources for this update

  1. 01Mankad and colleagues · Scientific Reports · 11 February 2026
  2. 02ABC News · outbreak subsides · 16 December 2021
  3. 03CSIRO · researcher publication record
  4. 04ABC News · original outbreak report · 22 January 2021
  5. 05Okello and colleagues · Economic aftermath · PLOS One · 21 April 2026
Ending Found

The infestation subsided. Its human impact lasted longer.

The NSW outbreak had subsided by the end of 2021. Two 2026 studies document what followed: a lasting stress burden for some surveyed adults and substantial economic costs within the surveyed sample. They provide a supported account of this outbreak’s aftermath, without establishing that everyone recovered, diagnosing PTSD across the population, or putting a final price on all losses statewide. Future outbreaks are a separate question.

Still wondering about another story?

Tell us what you remember. We'll follow up...

Ask Then What? →
No exact headline needed.
Request a follow-up →
We’ll use your email only to handle this request and let you know if it’s published. No newsletter signup.Add a name to be credited publicly if your question becomes a story. Leave it blank for a “Requested update” stamp.Your email stays private. Requests are reviewed; publication is not guaranteed. We use your details only for this request, as explained in our privacy notice.
Next: your email. No newsletter signup.